Main Content Cap
10

A Thought on the Purpose of Church Services

A conversation I recently had with a friend has me thinking. It has me thinking a lot actually.

I made some comment on Facebook questioning the type of people our churches are "attracting." He politely said, "the church isn't for the unsaved anyway."

It sounded crazy at first, but after he explained himself, it started to make a lot of sense. It all stems from the definition of "church." And by definition, the church is simply a group of people who have faith in Jesus. By that, an unbeliever cannot be part of the church, because faith is a prerequisite for inclusion. 

That being said, I wonder if we're going about how we do our "church services" all wrong.

I have been in church my entire life and the whole time I have viewed the gathering of believers ("church") as a place that was supposed to be geared toward making unbelievers feel welcome. In fact, the thing today is to make the Sunday morning service "relevant" to unbelievers and welcoming. The idea is for believers to invite their unbelieving friends to that gathering so they will in turn accept the gospel at that event.

But, when you consider the fact church is for believers, it throws a kink in that concept.

If church is a body of believers, why would the primary gathering for those believers be taylored for people who aren't supposed to come anyway?

I mean seriously, why would we expect someone who doesn't know Christ to come to a worship service and "enjoy the music"? Christians are worshiping a "dead" Jewish guy who claimed to be the Messiah! Why would anyone other than someone who claimed to be regenerated by God want to experience that?

You might be thinking the same question I had: "How then do we share the gospel if we're not supposed to use Sunday morning as a place for unbelievers to attend?"

A very valid question. In answering this, it's important to look at the biblical role for church leadership.

Ephesians 4:11-12 says God has gifted some people with different leadership roles "to prepare God's people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up."

Hmm.

So according to Paul, it's not the institutional church's "job" to share the gospel. It's each individual member's job. The leaders of the church are supposed to build up believers to go out and share the gospel. It says nothing about inviting people into our meetings in hopes they will respond to an altar call there. It says just the opposite.

The Bible never says it's the pastor's job, deacon's job, elder's job, or worship leader's job to share the gospel with unbelievers. It says it's the Christian's job. That includes pastors, deacons, edlers, and other offices held in church, but it includes every believer too.

And my friend, based on how I'm thinking these days, and the verses that talk about who the church is, that is supposed to happen outside the walls of the church.

Here are a few problems I see with making the Sunday morning worship service (or any other worship service) geared toward converting unbelievers:

  • Worship's primary purpose changes from glorifying God to entertainment, making it more about a slick production than anything else
  • It discourages believers from becoming true fishers of men
  • It encourages believers and unbelievers alike to become consumers
  • It blurs the lines between a true disciple and curious follower
  • Style and image become very, very important (too important)

In saying this, I need to point out I don't see anything in the Bible or in early church history that suggests unbelievers should not be allowed to attend a gathering of followers of Jesus. In the early church, curious unbelievers were allowed to attend, but merely as spectators, not as ones participating. They were welcomed to attend, but they were asked to leave during the sacraments.

The scary thing is, I don't really know what this type of gathering is supposed to look like. What do you do if you're not supposed to make it appealing to unbelievers? What kind of music do you play? Do you have it in a set aside building? Do you have it on Sunday? 

I'm not through thinking about this. I'm very excited about what it looks like though. What are your thoughts?

Jacob

Main Content Cap
 
10 Comments
Shelly Bracey
Jan 25, 2010
11:40 am
I'm glad you posted this because these thoughts have been rolling around in my brain for quite a while. I remember what Tim Awtrey (missionary to Bulgaria) told me his concept of church was. His thoughts were that church should be geared toward discipling Christians and glorifying God. He welcomes anyone to join but does not have any type of "altar call" for the unsaved. He thinks people should first be curious about Jesus and the church, then after attending a while and learning more of what Christianity means, a person should make a decision to deny or accept Christ. Instead of having one, come to the altar and get saved moment, it is more of a progression and an importance being placed on knowing exactly what one is "getting into" before he/she makes a decision. My thoughts are similar to Tims. I believe that gearing messages to the unsaved gives unbelievers the idea that we expect them to confirm to Biblical morals before they can be Christians, rather than accepting Christ and letting him transform you. Also, altar calls geared toward the unsaved also can become more emotional experiences rather than educated, and real decisions to take on our radical lifestyle.
cap
 
 
Curt Gwartney
Jan 25, 2010
12:05 pm
Great thoughts, Jacob! The church IS for believers! I'm afraid that too many churches have lost this perspective. Certainly we want the unsaved to come to our worship services (and we usually have some unsaved here every week), but we cannot make our worship services about the unsaved. Worship is about the Lord! If we lose that perspective, then we are not worshipping (at least not worshipping Him). We plan services and events that intentionally focus on presenting the Gospel and reaching the lost, but in reality, far more souls are won to Christ through one-on-one witnessing. And that is best accomplished through a genuine relationship with the unsaved person.
cap
 
 
Matthew Price
Jan 25, 2010
01:43 pm
Amen... all I have to say is AMEN!
cap
 
 
Scott Cheatham
Jan 25, 2010
03:36 pm
I think the tension we manage between unbeliever and believer in our worship is one that comes with gaining an understanding of your people who are committed and building your foundation from what God has to say to us today. Build from the side of God reaching out and develop a ministry to the faithful attenders in your church. Unbelievers are welcome and we do issue an altar call at each service. I understand the reasoning of some who feel led to not do it but ultimately, some people come with a lot of baggage and the act of coming forward and "leaving" that baggage at the foot of the cross for some has significance. I work diligently to follow up in a grace filled manner to mature someone who made a decision but ultimately, only time will tell if their decision was genuine. I still have my greatest successes in one on one conversations. Great thoughts Jacob.
cap
 
 
Jamie Lane
Jan 25, 2010
04:36 pm
Exactly. This is what I have been talking about for awhile now. I pray that a real revival comes through 20-30 somethings that see this too. It would totally change our denomination.
cap
 
 
Richard Atwood
Jan 26, 2010
08:44 am
I'm glad you brought this up for a couple of reasons. This is very important and we need to be talking about it. And I'm glad you are willing to separate tradition from the Bible. Tradition is not always wrong, but let's be willing to ask why we do something. However, I don't see most churches really changing their services to reach the unsaved. I know some churches do things like leave out a cross or some songs for fear of offending people. But I've never been to any of those. I'm afraid that most churches aren't really thinking about the unsaved at all. Or at least not very much. I've got so many thoughts on this that I'll probably write a blog about it myself. I'll send you a link. This is an important issue for the home missionaries that I work with. Personally, I want to get more unsaved people in church and want to see us all to a better job welcoming every newcomer. I think we can do this without compromising. Thanks again for your good thoughts.
cap
 
 
Jacob
Jan 26, 2010
09:05 am
Hey Mr. Richard! I will agree with you that most churches in our circle aren't changing their sunday morning service to appeal to unbelievers (or at least not doing it well). Some very large and progressive churches are doing it though. Lifechurch.tv is a great example. Praise God that people accept Christ there every week, so there's obviously something to learn, but their model is "make church services cool, get unbelievers there, and get them saved at that service." Where does the sending come into play there? At what point does every believer come to the realization they, and not the institutional church, are the carriers of the gospel? That's what scares me about the attraction model. Do you see my red flag on this? Or should we have the mindset of "whatever works"? I'd love to hear your thoughts as someone who's experienced in missions.
cap
 
 
Brandon
Jan 26, 2010
09:49 am
Interesting discussion. We have been talking about this same thing in our lifegroups at our church. I think in some ways it is more comfortable for Christians to place the responsibility of evangelism on the church and the pastor. It's like we have done our jobs if we invite someone to church. Who cares if they don't come or don't respond? It's not our fault. Reggie McNeal lays partial "blame" for this mindset on a generational concept in his book The Present Future. Think about it. About fifty or sixty years ago Americans started outsourcing everything from cooking (fast food anyone?) to parties (hello Chuckie Cheese) to entertainment (you tell me what this book is supposed to look like on the big screen). McNeal says this same movement has affected religion: it became the church's job to teach children Bible stories (Sunday School) and it was the pastor's job to grow the church (that's what we pay him for, right?) I'm not saying this is the only explanation, but I have been intrigued by his study of how our generational "cultures" have created multi-cultural experiences in churches even if they are full of members of the same "types" of people, and this idea of outsourcing Christianity is not without merit.
cap
 
 
Naomi Cassata
Feb 01, 2010
01:43 pm
Wow, I never thought about this before, but it makes total sense. The scripture you brought out is one I just read this weekend and have been pondering what my role in church really is. Thank you so much for your insight into this subject.
cap
 
 
Neil Gilliland
Feb 03, 2010
07:12 am
Exactly my sentiments Jacob. If anyone has ever heard me speak (more than once) I usually say at some point, "God said go, He did not say sit ye there and wait ye there for them to come unto thee so you can preach to them...He said go." To take it one step further we also spend most of our "free time" with fellow believers rather than developing relationships with unbelievers. Church to me is a regular gathering of believers to celebrate the resurrected Lord, be instructed and encouraged in deepening our relationship with Him and how to better live out that relationship in our lives, i.e. "preach" to those who are outside the Kingdom. If we really live out that life we will look foolish and it is through that foolishness that others are drawn to Him. That is not a slam on "preaching" as we know it but I think our traditional definition of preaching is limited. Please be clear, I love it when unbelievers attend our services and hopefully it is something that would reflect the kind of relationship we have with Christ that they would want to share in this life.
cap
 
 
 

This weblog reflects the personal views of Jacob Riggs in his individual capacity. It does not necessarily represent the views of Randall House Publications. Any links from this blog to other sites are provided simply for convenient access to the information contained therein and should not be construed as endorsements of these other sites or their content. Neither the company nor this individual is responsible for content, links, or products found on any other site.



Join The Discussion Add your comment below.