Main Content Cap

What Does Jesus Think About Free Healthcare?

cap
Nov 17, 2009 Author: Alan Skiles
Topic: Politics
6
 
cap
 

 

Health care has been a topic of heated debate in the past several months. It's been discussed from every possible angle, except one . . . What would Jesus do? For those of you who are wondering, "Did he just throw that line?" Yes. I did. But forget about the bracelet and let's connect the dots here. To the surprise of many, we can learn a lot about this debate from what Jesus did. And for the Christian, life is to revolve around doing what Jesus would do. So, with an issue that would fundamentally change the way Americans live (or die, as it may be), why not consider His opinion?

            Whether conservative or liberal, the debate rides the fence on three issues: compassion, fairness, and utopia. When we compare these issues to the redemptive work of Christ, there is revealing truth that should clarify the health care debate for us all.

            First, let's examine the issue of compassion. Those who call for health care reform tell the tragic stories of victims who suffer at the hands of the existing system. They hope to inspire compassion that leads to radical change, while opponents save their compassion for those that would lose benefits due to reform. Then there is fairness. Reform advocates believe that everyone deserves the same coverage and that this should be enforced by law. Dissenters say that this leads to nothing but entitlement, which they feel is a myth. Instead, people deserve only what they earn for themselves. Finally, there are those that believe we can achieve utopia in this world as it is. They believe that people get better as generations go by, and that we are smarter, more enlightened, and more capable than any past generation. They feel that health care reform is a progressive step in the right direction.

            So what does redemption say about health care reform? Well, a lot of those on that train are the same people who use the Beatitudes (Matthew 5:1-12) to condemn judgmental Christians. While what this Scripture says is highly important, what it doesn't say is equally important. And when it comes to compassion, nothing is said about legislation. Instead, the greatest show of compassion from our Savior was done of His own free will. When a disciple tried to fight the mob that came to arrest the Savior, Jesus said, "Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?" (Matthew 26:53) While Jesus' work spoke volumes about compassion, they said nothing about coercion.

            When it comes to fairness, I'm thankful Jesus didn't have much use for the idea. He told the adulterous woman that her sins were forgiven. He asked the Father to forgive those who crucified Him, because they didn't know what they were doing. Romans 5:8 tells us He died for mankind while we were still in our sins. Fairness wouldn't have let those stories end the way they did. Yes, fairness is a foreign concept in the Bible, and it makes me wonder where it came from in the first place. And entitlement just reminds me I was entitled to an eternal residence in Hell. People in their illusion of their own righteousness are feeling as if they are entitled to a far different destiny than reality suggests. And do you think for a moment this has nothing to do with why we feel as if we are entitled to free health care?

            Lastly, Jesus spoke of a utopia, but He said before we see that, He would come and get us to take us there. In John 14, we have the picture of utopia described for us by Jesus Himself, but verse 3 makes it clear that it is not here, not now, and not made by man. It is later, prepared by Him, and involves a trip to somewhere else.

            So with Jesus, compassion is best when done voluntarily, and fairness wouldn't pan out how we think. And utopia: it's not here, not now, and not of our own making. Jesus does, however, uphold the commandments that condemn stealing, whether it be from an individual or future generations that would pay for our mistakes. And he preaches we should be dependent on Him, not a government. And don't think for a moment there's nothing you can do about this issue. You have congressmen and senators who need your go ahead to vote for what they already know is right. Their phone numbers are just a Google search away. What would Jesus do? You tell me.

 

Alan Skiles is a 2007 graduate of Free Will Baptist Bible College. He and his wife Grace reside in Jackson, TN, where he pastors Victory Free Will Baptist Church.

Main Content Cap
 
6 Comments
teresa hulme from callahan fl, FL
Sep 02, 2010
08:51 pm
free health care where did you get that from it would nt be free everyone would pay more taxes for it .whats wrong with everyone pitching in so everyone would be covered ,are nt we suppose to help eachother i think jesus would want everyone to be covered like the rest of the world.i ve lived in europe and enjoyed being covered with healthcare,i had no problems with it.i really think Jesus would be happy with healthcare that ministered to everyone....
cap
 
 
Rachel from jax, MN
Sep 03, 2010
07:27 am
Wow, cant believe what I just read! Well lets see I find it quite suprising that this article would come from a pastor's heart. Isnt the simple message of the christian life to put others before ourselves and care about each other's welfare. Look in acts what the people did when they were saved. ~And all that believed were together, and had all things common; and sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, Praising God, and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved. (Acts 2:40-47) And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that out of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common. And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all. Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, and laid them down at the apostles’ feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need. (Acts 4:32-35) We see here what type of attititude as christians should have . This is what christian love does, it wants to put others before theirselves, it doesnt care about fairness. I find it interesting that you would use them passages in the midle to make your point or show your stance on the healthcare, you are comparing apples with oranges my brother and should check your theology on the christians fruits. Now I see why so many "American Christians" have this mindset on healthcare look what our pastors are saying, very sad. Its everyone for themselves! Today’s church robs the poor of her substance, while yesterday’s church supplied the poor by the Grace of God, her needs. So the people have to look to the government for help, because Today’s church has become a “money making” business, while yesterday’s church sold their businesses and distributed money to the poor. What a sad mouth piece you have been for God on this subject pastor, and using Gods holy word to set your purpose and thoughts to condone your opinions on this matter, leave Gods word out of it, or represent the word rightly not for your own selfish desires.
cap
 
 
Alan from Wake Forest, NC
Dec 15, 2010
01:02 pm
This is very much delayed, but I must thrust one hole in your argument, Rachel. I think this will sufficiently answer both rebutals to my article. First of all, I'd say that you and I actually agree on what the scripture says about the heart of a Christian. The problem is that scripture says nothing about a legislative process that would enforce so-called "compassion" or "unity" or whatever you want to call it by law. If it is thus enforced, it ceases to be compassion by its very definition. The real issue we have as Christians is that we have passed off the responsibility we have as assigned by the Holy Spirit to a government who does not recognized God as their ruler. We as Christians have become lazy, and the government has stepped in to do the job that is rightfully ours! So I'm against health care legislation for the same reason that you seem to be for it. It is the job of the church to be unified and compassionate, taking care of others in need, and it is most certainly not the job of government.
cap
 
 
Brian from Scottdale, PA
Jan 29, 2011
12:16 pm
I liked your rebuttal to Rachel's argument better then the article :) The issue of health care reform is not really about compassion. There are plenty of people on both sides of the issue who have a tremendous heart for people - as well as those on both sides who only have their own political or financial interests at heart. With only a few exceptions, we all would love to see a more equal, more just society where everyone has a good job and quality healthcare is readily available. The main difference in this debate comes down to the issue of effectiveness. Does government-mandated and run healthcare lead to a better health system than a private system with profit as the bottom line? In Canada while healthcare is free for everyone, the quality of healthcare has plummeted with a government system - to the point where the wealthy there now pay American doctors to get treatment... not exactly a model for social justice. In the United Kingdom, where the system is only partially funded by the government, the costs to sustain the level of care have been much higher than projected. The US government does not exactly have the best record for either sustaining quality (compare public schools to private ones), or controlling costs (Social Security, Medicade). I completely agree that in many respects the government has stepped in to areas in which the church has failed to meet its responsibility, and that does need to change.
cap
 
 
Glenn from Newport news, VA
Jun 01, 2011
07:20 pm
Forgive me me but there are many passages in the the old testament about rulers or governments being just and having an obligation to the widow and to the poor. Their favor with God depended on how they treated the less fortunate. Theocracy or not their are righteous people in government who believe that compassion is not only an individual thing, but also a government undertaking it is the responsibility of a just government to protect the least of these. This excuse of people being forced to give through taxes is hogwash. Just think if we left FEMA, welfare,etc to churches and philanthropy do you think they would incur the funds to help the needy. And let's get one thing straight Jesus believed in the Torah and practiced it which you can't stomach pastor because it bleeds social justice. I find it hard to believe you are a pastor what do you skip the old testament ever wonder why Jesus was so much for the poor and least of these? Why he had so many scathing words for the rich?Answer Torah he knew it front to back an d it is a righteous governments duty to help the poor and to Legislate it.
cap
 
 
Barry Barringer from Fargo, ND
Jun 11, 2011
07:53 am
One thing that gets ignored here is that a policy can be a nice idea but produce poor results. Some supporters of "free" healthcare concede it will result in higher costs and lower quality of care but they still prefer that people have some measure of security. What matters most in public policy is that it produce better results for the most number of people.
cap
 
 
 


Join The Discussion Add your comment below.