Main Content Cap

Tweeting in Church: Why I Think It's OK

cap
Sep 11, 2009 Author: 
Topic: 
16
 
cap
 

 

I'd like to write a bit today about why I think tweeting in church could be OK, or even profitable for some. Keep in mind this is the personal view of Jacob Riggs. Thanks. :-)

The way I'll do this is in response to some commonly-used objections to using Twitter in church. I've had several conversations with people, so I've heard a lot of objections, most of which I think are valid (yeah, some objections are just dumb).

Objection #1: If You Tweet, You Can't Pay Attention

For some, this may be a problem. You just might not be able to tweet very quickly. But when I'm tweeting via my phone, it takes me about 30 seconds to tweet something. I just type 40404, send new text, type my message, and send it. It doesn't take much time at all. As a matter of fact, I might be able to tweet nearly at the same rate of writing something down on paper (which, if you do that, you're super-spiritual). However, I will say that if I used a smart phone to tweet, then it might cause me to lose focus more. But since I have one of the oldest phones in the world, I use texting to tweet, which doesn't cause me to lose focus. So in regards to tweeting taking too long and thus causing you to stop paying attention, this issue is different for different people. If you're a slow tweeter, then maybe, sure. But if you text quickly, tweeting a point in the sermon takes very little time, causing you to be able to pay attention just as well as you could if you were taking notes. 

Objection #2: Tweeting's Purpose is to Tell the World What YOU Think, While Taking Notes Is Trying to Learn Something

This is probably the best objection I've heard to tweeting in church. It originally came (as far as I know) from Joshua Harris' blog (who I guess has "Kissed Tweeting Goodbye"). He stated that the purpose for listening to preaching is to ask the question, "God, what are you saying to me?" And that that is contrary to the nature of twitter which asks the user, "What are you doing?"

Although that was the original intention for Twitter, if you use Twitter with any regularity, you will have noticed Twitter's purpose is evolving. It's not just about spouting off information that no one cares about. The best Tweeters say things that people following them will find beneficial.

So then, the reason someone would tweet in church about what God is speaking to them about would not be because they just want to be heard, but because the people following them want to hear what they have to say, or in this case, what God is speaking to them about.

Another point against this is to the fact that writing something down does help retain information. And not only writing something down, but writing something down for the purpose of other people reading it forces you to (1) listen to what's being presented and (2) process it enough to write it down. In this instance, tweeting is more beneficial than just taking notes. For me, if I have processed something enough to tell someone else about it, then I have really internalized it (which, I know what you're thinking, and it doesn't really take that long).

Objection #3: Your Tweeting Will Distract Other People

Think about a fake situation with me. Let's say I am tweeting some points that really hit home with me in the message. I'm paying attention, and I might look at my phone for about 30 seconds at a time to tweet, and I tweet about 4 times in the message. Now let's suppose someone just happened to look over at me and see me look down at my phone. They would be appalled right? Well, maybe. But the one thing they would do for certain is look at me again. Wouldn't you? And the next time they looked, chances are they would see that I was paying attention. They might actually see me listen to something and then enter it into my phone--which would tip them off that I was actually using my phone to help me. Now, if I wasn't paying attention to the sermon and was just on my phone the whole time, then that would obviously be a problem, and someone should confront me about it. But if I was actually using the technology for something positive, then they would notice that as well. If they saw me tweet and pay attention and were confused, then the biblical thing for them to do would be to come talk to me (if they were concerned about my spirituality). The unbiblical thing for them to do would be to get upset about it and tell someone else like a deacon or their friend or whatever, stating how offended they were by that. Well, I'm sorry, but if that person really wanted to be biblical, then they would do what the book of Matthew states to do if they are offended. In that case, the person who observed me tweet is much more in the wrong than I was for tweeting (if you want to get technical).

Objection #4: Tweeting During the Sermon Has No Value

This is very possibly an excellent point. There are many instances where tweeting would have no value in church. If no one is following you, then it has no value. If you're not tweeting about the sermon, then it has no value. Or if you're tweeting for selfish reasons, then it's actually detrimental.

However, these things do not have to be the case.

 

I do have a caveat or two about this whole issue (which in the grand scheme of life and the kingdom of God, is very miniscule isn't it?). And that is if I am at a place where they specifically ask me not to tweet during a certain portion, then I would have no problem not tweeting. It's just not that big of a deal. I can pay attention while not tweeting, so I have no problem with that. It's more important to live peacibly with everyone than it is to tweet in church. Plus, tweeting right after they asked you not to brings up all kinds of other problems not mentioned in this post.

My overall mindset in regard to using new media and technology in church is to use discernment, but don't be that guy that assumes just because it is new that means it's bad. Twitter is a tool. And tools are neutral. Just like a gun. A gun can be used for good or bad. Just because someone once used it for evil does not make the tool itself evil.

I want to be one of those guys that takes the tools available and uses them for good. There's just so much more freedom in it that way.

@jacobriggs

By the way, if you'd like to read Josh Harris' post about this subject, here it is. http://is.gd/39tbx

Main Content Cap
 
16 Comments
Jared
Sep 11, 2009
08:07 am
I'm sorry, but I just don't see how tweeting can have any positive impact on yourself or anybody who is following your tweets. Besides, shouldn't they be in church themselves? And if I saw you texting on your phone during church, there is no way my reaction would be that you were tweeting about how great the sermon is. That's ridiculous. If there is something worth tweeting, it should be saved for after the sermon. The last thing people do is need any kind of distraction in church. But then again, I don't twitter and I have been known to play with my cell phone during church, so my opinion probably doesn't matter.
cap
 
 
Jacob
Sep 11, 2009
08:10 am
Thanks for your response Jared. Instead of responding to your comments, I'd like to point out the original post answered every concern you have. Have a great day buddy! :-)
cap
 
 
Zack Anderson
Sep 11, 2009
08:53 am
Well, this comment is really off subject. I am new to this site and want to know if you are going to have a way to comment your pod casts? If not, I have a comment about Brink Podcast 9/4/09. The issue is about the profane language in the song you guys were talking about. It really all boils down to the Word of God. You were almost in support of this guy who in my opinion may influence many of our children. The Word of God says, Let no corrupt communication proceed from your lips. To me that is very clear cut. I agree that it was unnecessary and will be a stumbling block for many. Especially when we as Christians ride the fence on the issue.
cap
 
 
Jacob
Sep 11, 2009
08:55 am
Zack, Currently we do not have capabilities to have people respond to the podcast on our site. You can send feedback to thebrink@randallhouse.com though. Thanks for your interaction, Jacob
cap
 
 
jkriggs
Sep 11, 2009
09:01 am
I think this issue is specific to each situation - if a pastor encourages tweets - then do it - if a pastor discourages tweets - then don't. However, let's consider a situation that doesn't specify. No one says either way and there are no signs telling you not too - is it okay? I think tweeting can be good, however we should ask "What is best?" not "Is it okay?" My concern with tweeting is for the non-Christian. What will he think if he sees you tweeting (especially if he knows you to be a "Christain.") There is a definite conflct in priority here - at best this distraction (tweeting) will cause the unsaved to have doubts about the validity of your devotion (provided that he doesn't know what you are doing on your phone) - at worst he will doubt the validity of the Word. We must do our best to minimize all distractions during church, so that the unsaved and unfaithful will have the best oportunity possible to hear the Word of God and hear the Holy Spirit speak. So ask yourself, "what is best?" not, "Is it okay?"
cap
 
 
Stephanie Olsen
Sep 11, 2009
09:11 am
Well, I have already posted my thoughts on the subject, and I was a lone wolf on the forum as well. That is fine, everyone has a different opinion, to each his own. That is why there are different types of churches out there to help us grow the best spiritually for each us personally. I think one of the biggest problems with people who are against it may just not understand how it is used and the impact that Twitter can have, just as you pointed out. Our church encourages the use of Twitter, and I personally have seen people (who are not in church/ or christians) be encouraged, ask questions about what my pastor said, and tune into the sermon live feed because of the tweets going out. It's all about getting the Word out to the world.
cap
 
 
Mark
Sep 11, 2009
09:16 am
Jacob, you've presented your points very well. And you have given a valid reason for the good that can come from tweeting in church. I would like to address two (maybe three) things, separately. And I'll admit that I do not twitter at all, so forgive me if I have misconceptions. I would assume that you would not be the only fellow in your congregation tweeting during the sermon. I would also assume that you are friends with the other tweeters. I would then also assume that many of you would have the same followers, and perhaps you follow each other. So tell me, and be honest, are you not tempted to be the quickest gun? Does it become your desire to tweet that awesome quote before your friends beat you to it? Does the worship service then become more about listening with your thumb on the keypad waiting for that tweetable moment than about worship? Maybe that doesn't happen to you, but it seems to me that could be a danger I'd want to avoid. It's kind of like when I watched the President's school speech the other day. Half the kids in attendance had their phones pointed at Obama, giving me the impression that they couldn't care less what his message was. They just wanted to be the first to put it on youtube.
cap
 
 
Mark
Sep 11, 2009
09:32 am
My second concern may have already been addressed in another comment. I've been preaching in 1 Corinthians for awhile, so I have been devoting a lot of thought to looking out for the weaker brother. I don't think you should pander to legalists, but I fear you could do a lot of damage to the "weak" Christian, or even a seeker, who can't distinguish texting from tweeting, or a relevant tweet from a trivial one. It gives the appearance the sermon is not to be listened to. You could be talking to your bud, or making a grocery list, for all he knows. Your innocent tweet becomes a stumblingblock and a sin against this brother, and therefore a sin against Christ (1 Cor. 8:12)
cap
 
 
Jacob
Sep 11, 2009
09:42 am
Mark, Thanks for your thoughtful response. I am not aware of anyone else at my church who tweets during the sermon. The concern you presented there is valid though and one to be considered. Also, I very, very rarely tweet myself. I might have tweeted 3 or 4 times total during the sermon. Although I don't do it very often, I think it could be beneficial in some instances, and I have no problem with other people doing it while I'm speaking. I actually saw one of my friends' tweets from a sermon I recently preached, and I loved it that he payed attention enough to get that point! He had the main point of my message pegged! Your second concern is also valid, which leads me to think it would probably be best to tweet if the pastor or leadership of the church has expressed a desire for its members to do so. If this is done, then visitors will know what is going on. It would help alleviate some of the problems you presented (that jkriggs above also mentioned). My overall point is that this issue is not as cut and dry as some might like to think. I also agree with Stephanie that a lot of people who talk about this issue are not fully aware of what twitter is.
cap
 
 
Jacob
Sep 11, 2009
09:45 am
Mark, one mistake in my last comment. I do remember one person who might tweet periodically during church from my church (he tweeted during my sermon), but we've never talked about the concept.
cap
 
 
Nicole
Sep 11, 2009
02:32 pm
My husband and I were talking about this very issue the other day. We are both tweeters. My opinion, I do not think that someone should tweet during church; but on the other hand, my husband thinks it's perfectly fine. I see his point just like yours Jacob. But what is wrong with waiting until the service is over to tweet about the sermon? To me, this way no one thinks you are just texting or messing with your phone.
cap
 
 
Aaron Baldridge
Sep 15, 2009
01:24 pm
I have been thinking about this a lot lately. I actually discussed it with some of the college age and young adults in my congregation. I was surprised that they were divided on the issue too. Most of them do not tweet. But, they don't see anything wrong as long as they are paying attention to the sermon. So many of todays students and young adults can pay attention to more than one thing at a time and be really paying attention to all of them. Not me. Also, one caveat to add to yours Jacob. The reverse is also true, just because something is new does not mean that is good or better. I think we get sucked into that trap sometimes.
cap
 
 
Patrick
Sep 16, 2009
12:34 pm
I love tweeting during sermons (and other lectures), and I have gained a lot from reading other tweets from their pastor's sermons. That being said, I do not tweet during church because my students are not allowed to use their cell phones at church, I just want to be a good example. Another reason I do not tweet is that our church only has one person that tweets on a regular basis (me) so the majority of the people (who are also over 65) will think their pastor is being utterly disrespectful. On another note, maybe we should ask the question is it okay for the pastor to tweet during his sermon? Sample tweets: Patrick: is preaching to a crowd that is half asleep or Patrick: wishes everyone would stop tweeting so he could see their faces while he preaches. jsut a thought
cap
 
 
Jeff P.
Sep 18, 2009
04:50 am
I have absolutely nothing new to add to this discussion. I just want to cast my vote: Although I personally see nothing "wrong" with it, I choose not to tweet during the service to avoid being a stumbling block to those who view me as a leader. I don't want to give indirect permission for texting during church to those who follow me.
cap
 
 
Clay
Sep 18, 2009
01:03 pm
(Great discussion! I love what's going on with Web site!) Tweeting during a sermon is ok by me only if it contributes to the worship of God and the tweeter's spiritual growth and is mindful to minimize the perceived distraction. It is not a distraction to me. I know of others who look up their scripture on an iphone and a PDA (yes, I said PDA. i know--it's so 1990s). I'm fine with that even though someone else may think that they are texting/tweeting/goofing off. All that said, I shy away from the cell during a sermon because this is so new. It'll take some time for our culture to be ok with it, of course, by then we'll all have thumb arthritis.
cap
 
 
Patrick
Sep 21, 2009
05:16 am
I don't personally think tweeting is wrong in church. I don't tweet. I would like to comment though, that Paul said in one of his epistles, that we should not eat meat if eating meat offends one of our brothers. I think this issue solely depends on the church. A more conservative older congregration most likely won't approve and tweeting should be avoided in a church atmosphere like that. A younger, more contemporary church would probably promote tweeting in order to gain interest from younger people who have relationships with christians who attend that kind of church. We are all one body and should not look down on those who do tweet in church. I am sure GOD will find a way to use it positively as long as people don't cross the line with it.
cap
 
 
 


Join The Discussion Add your comment below.