Main Content Cap

Reflections on Gender Equality

cap
Sep 14, 2009 Author: Stephanie Malcolm
Topic: Marriage and Family
5
 
cap
 

 

I have been reflecting a lot lately on what my "theology" of marriage is, and that has led me to thinking in general on equality between the genders. I feel like I am stuck in between two camps. The dominant views I've heard seem to depict men as the ultimate authority in everything or try to make it appear as though women are the only people capable of accomplishing anything.

I grew up in the south, where "chivalry" rules all relationships. I don't simply mean that men act as gentlemen—the Southern Chivalry teaches men act as gentlemen because women are incapable of taking care of themselves, let alone contributing anything to a relationship. I found that women were seen as the submissive member of the relationship. The men make all of the decisions. The men decide when a relationship starts, what happens in the relationship, and seem to dictate where the relationship is going. Women who make any kind of move are seen as loose and inappropriate. I have watched women give up their hopes and dreams for their husbands. They give up everything to be married.

I'm not talking about the marriages with "traditional" gender roles. Many healthy relationships have the man as the breadwinner and the woman sitting at home, contributing to the relationship by keeping the house her husband provides. I don't have a problem with homemakers at all. If that is what you want to do, then go ahead and do it. There isn't a problem with that. I am talking about women in my life who have repeatedly given up their dreams for their husbands until not only do they see themselves as a little less than human—their husbands come to adopt the same view.

On the other hand, I have known women who value themselves entirely over their husbands. They treat their husbands like they are little kids incapable of accomplishing anything. Men are seen as children and women are seen as the responsible ones. This seems to be the view growing in popularity in our culture. Almost all relationship on TV work this way—the women have an extra child in their home and call him "husband." If someone makes a stupid mistake, it's the man, and it's up to the woman to find time between her two jobs, taking care of her kids, and doing all the housework to fix the problem.

I think both sides are wrong. We are called to submit to one another in love. That means both submit to each other. It is a relationship of equality. We should value one another's dreams as much as the other person. While I don't mind having a door held for me, why can't I in love hold the door for another? If we as a church truly believe in equality, then we need to have that in our relationships.

Stephanie Malcolm lives in Mission, Kansas with her husband Steve. Together, they attend the Nazarene Theological Seminary.

Main Content Cap
 
5 Comments
larry from Prairie Grove, AR
Sep 14, 2009
02:53 pm
Ephesians 5:22-25 ESV; 22-Wives submit to your own husbands as to the Lord. 23-For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands. 25-Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her. Where are we (husbands and wives) callled to submit to one another in love? From what I read in Ephesians 5, the wife is to submit to the husband and the husband is to love the wife like Christ loved the church, to the point of being willing to give himself for it. Maybe I'm missing something.
cap
 
 
Stephanie from Mission, KS
Sep 19, 2009
10:59 pm
Ephesians 5:21 (NRSV) says, "Be subject to one another out of reverence for Christ."
cap
 
 
Patrick from Oklahoma City, OK
Sep 21, 2009
06:16 am
The issue with this discussion that i have is the scriptural reference is from different versions of the bible, each with a different meaning. This is a classic example of the problem we have in american Christian society. With so many versions of the bible, all except the KJV, NIV, NKJV, twist the Word and alter the meaning that God intended for us to know. The KJV of the bible is considered to be most historically accurate when compared to actual writing from scribes during Jesus's life and Paul's missions. I can understand how this is a sensitive subject. I don't agree that relationships should be one-sided. A man is to love his wife as Christ loved the church. A wife is supposed to submit to her husband as the leader of the home. This does not mean a man is to completely control his wife as something not human. Likewise, this does not mean a wife should endanger herself or her children by following a poor leader as a husband. Take this for what you want, but don't trust the Word unless it comes from the KJV. (Ephesians 5:21-25 KJV 21. Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God. Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as unto Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it.) Now, you should also read the rest of the chapter. There is a specific reason God has commanded the relationship work this way. God holds the man accountable for the family, and God commands that man love there wife in a way that would not result in the kind of relationships you described above.
cap
 
 
Jacob from Nashville, TN
Sep 21, 2009
08:47 am
I think it's really cool how the Scripture talks about how each gender's need is fulfilled in different ways. For example, I don't really care if you love me. I care if you respect me. Well what do you know that's exactly what Paul said for wives to do to their husbands "wives, respect your husbands." My wife wants me to love more than she wants me to respect her. That's why Paul wrote that husbands should love their wives like Christ loved the church. I think it's really cool how Scripture speaks to the need of each member of a marriage.
cap
 
 
Larry
Sep 21, 2009
09:07 am
Ephesians 5:21 needs to be looked at in context. We are to submit to our fellow believers out of our reverence for Christ. This also consistent with the writings in Phillipians 2. There are 4 different groups being spoken to here. Ephesians 5:19-21 deal with how we are to relate person to person, husbands and wives are being instructed in 5:22-33, children and parents in 6:1-4, and slaves and masters in 6:5-9. To use Ephesians 5:21 in reference to husbands and wives would be taking that verse out of context no matter what version of the Bible you use.
cap
 
 
 


Join The Discussion Add your comment below.